
The
coming state assembly elections have brought to the forefront many issues which
were in the background for quite some time in Uttar Pradesh. These are going to
decide and define the future of the state. There is one phenomenon that I
observe explicitly - there are actually no major issues at stake in this
election. But despite that, the current is strong and the voting percentage is
likely to increase significantly.
One
current somewhat visible is that there is going to be negative voting against
the BSP though the government seems to have done quite well on many economic
issues. This must be seen in tandem with the cadre based voting for the BSP
which has not diminished in any significant manner. The reason for this lies in
the mode of governance. The BSP played the caste game in the last elections
quite openly - the same game is going to be their undoing this time round.
The
BSP played the Dalit-Brahmin card in the last elections and did very well. But
since Brahmins by and large (except for Satish Mishra's extended family) got
nothing in the bargain, and the kind of governance that has been provided by
Mayawati has disillusioned them, they are willing to go elsewhere. With the
Brahmins almost deserting the BSP, the party is now looking for new caste
equations.
Another
feature of the current UP political scene is the freshness of faces. It is
undeniable that in the last two- three years two young political faces - Rahul
Gandhi and Akhilesh Yadav - have done a tremendous amount of ground work in the
state.
Features

While
the former has given people a new point of view, the latter has built up the
party cadre and established a rapport with the people. Akhilesh has also
successfully changed the image of the party.
The
Bharatiya Janata Party, the other major political party in the state, continues
to disappoint. The party is unlikely to show any marked improvement over its
performance in the last elections. The other parties like the RLD, Peace Party,
NCP, RJD and TMC are more of spoilers than winners. But the role of the Peace
Party needs to be watched with interest.
The
more striking issues that need to be kept in mind are:
Governance,
or the lack of it, is going to be an issue. The BSP and its government are now
distinct from each other. The government is led by a few and the party people
have been left to believe that she is the best thing that could have happened
to the Dalits. The common people do accept this, but their role in government
is so minimal that they are feeling the pinch of this disconnect.
The
first time voters are going to tilt the balance, as their numbers are large and
they are aware of several crucial issues facing the nation and the state. This voter
class is unnerving almost all parties.
The
idea of the division of the state, which the BSP initially thought would be its
trump card and would also confound the other political parties, has confused
the BSP itself. The iconic image that the BSP supremo has created for herself
is the main reason for this. The cadre is nervous that Mayawati will confine
herself to one state, and the other three new states would end up as losers.
Sensing this, the BSP decided not to push this issue at all.
The
BSP is crumbling as a Dalit party because it tried to bridge the vote deficit
by wooing other castes whose members, seizing the opportunity, indulged in all
kinds of corrupt practices, bringing down the image of the government.
Moreover, Mayawati's "I can do no wrong" and "blame it on
others" approach further alienated the government from the people.
The
Brahmins are not going to vote for the BSP because the Brahmin face of the
party has come to be associated with one individual and the expected benefits
for Brahmins were taken away by his family and friends. This kind of approach
is successful with only those castes and communities where there is an acute
shortage of leaders. It becomes counterproductive otherwise - in case of
Brahmins this has been proven several times before.
Neither
corruption nor development is becoming an issue because of the disillusionment
of common voters on these two issues.
Kalyan
Singh will be a nonentity this time - he will not be a spoiler either.
The
RLD and SP are going to dominate western UP, whereas the SP and Congress are
likely to dominate the east.
The
BSP is going to be third or fourth in the number of seats won, the first two
being the SP and Congress. The idea might sound preposterous at this stage, but
in the coming days this is the way things will unfold.
The
BSP model of governance has disillusioned the people who have felt absolutely
marginalised from governance. The iron-fist grip of the BSP led group of
bureaucrats-cum-politicians succeeded in achieving only one objective - make
enormous amounts of money. That money came in through different routes - parks,
memorials, the liquor trade, new expressways.
Young
voters are likely to decide the fate of the state as well as the government
this time - courtesy the election commission. This is causing both nervousness
as well as some cautious enthusiasm. The SP is cautious about not coming up
with promises relating to student politics, as this might remind voters of its
earlier record of promoting hooliganism. The Congress, too, is being cautious
in this respect. However, both the parties are hoping that their youth leaders
will help them attract first time voters.
Contenders
The
RLD is also looking up to its new generation leader and despite all its
limitations, its pact with Congress is likely to yield it rich dividends,
especially given the other factors mentioned earlier.
Also
to watch for is the so- called Anna factor. Three or four months back everyone
thought that Anna's agitation will make all the difference in this election;
today, no one is even talking about it.
There
is another factor that intrigues me: the role of the castes.
The
BSP is doing badly primarily not because of any significant shift against the
party, but because of the perception that little changed in the state despite
its ruling the state for five years with an absolute majority. A ruling party
needs to contest elections on the basis of its performance.
The
BSP, though it looked to do that initially, changed its stance once major scams
broke out and ministers had to resign one after the other on corruption
charges. Suddenly, the party which was boasting of its performance began
talking about its social engineering agenda, and ultimately it was reduced to
giving tickets on the basis of caste.
The
Congress, despite having had an advantage over the others after performing so
well in the 2009 Lok Sabha elections, remains yet another party in the fray.
There are two main reasons for this: one, they still have a very weak cadre
base in the state and two, their top leaders have a poor connect with the
masses. Everyone knows what happened when Rahul Gandhi asked Congressmen to
spend nights in villages!
There
is no denying the fact that the Congress, despite having to face the Anna
storm, is the party which has done the maximum preparations for these
elections. However, due to lack of adequate connect with the masses; it has
left a lot of space for the SP to forge ahead.
No
industry, poor health facilities, poor quality of education - particularly
higher education- complete tolerance for all kinds of corruption, and lack of
tolerance for dissent are the issues which affect the thinking class, which, it
must be said, hardly matters in election time.
Manoj
Dixit, is a Professor and Head, Department of Public Administration, Lucknow
University